What is the main difference between monopoly and monopsony? Monopoly is where a single seller dominates the market while monopsony is where a single buyer dominates the market.
Market structure is divided into monopoly, monopsony, pure competition, perfect competition, monopolistic, and oligopoly. Each market structure has unique characteristics and restrictions.
This post explains the differences and similarities between monopoly and monopsony. We have also highlighted unique characteristics associated with each market structure.
Difference between Monopoly and Monopsony With Table
| Basic Terms | Monopoly | Monopsony |
| Market Structure | Single seller dominates the market. | Single buyer dominates the market. |
| Control Over Price | The monopolist controls and sets the price. | The monopsonist controls and sets the purchase price. |
| Competition | No competition in the selling side. | No competition in the buying side. |
| Demand Elasticity | Demand is typically inelastic. | Demand is typically inelastic. |
| Market Power | Monopolist holds market power. | Monopsonist holds market power. |
| Product Differentiation | Monopoly often involves product differentiation. | Monopsony typically involves homogenous products. |
| Barriers to Entry | High barriers to entry for potential competitors. | High barriers to entry for potential suppliers. |
| Non-Price Competition | Monopoly may engage in non-price competition. | Monopsony may engage in non-price competition. |
| Impact on Prices | Tends to result in higher prices for consumers. | Tends to result in lower prices for suppliers. |
| Examples | De Beers in the diamond market, Microsoft in software. | The only employer in a small company town, a dominant buyer of agricultural products. |
What Is Monopoly?
A monopoly is a market structure characterized by the presence of a single seller or producer who is the sole provider of a specific product, service, or resource in a given market or industry.
Monopoly market has no close substitutes for the product or service offered. The monopolistic firm has complete control over the market.
Key features of a monopoly include:
- A monopoly is characterized by the presence of a single firm that holds exclusive control over the entire market. This firm is the sole provider of the product or service, and there are no competing firms within the market.
- The product or service offered by the monopoly has no close substitutes or alternatives. Consumers have no choice but to purchase from the monopolist if they want the specific product or service.
- Monopolies often have high barriers to entry, which make it extremely difficult for new firms to enter the market and compete. These barriers can include legal restrictions, patents, control of essential resources, economies of scale, and significant capital requirements.
- The monopolistic firm is a price maker, not a price taker. It has the ability to set the price at a level that maximizes its own profits, rather than being constrained by market forces.
- In a monopoly, there is no competition. As a result, the monopolistic firm does not face the competitive pressures that firms in other market structures do. It can maintain higher prices and lower quantities to maximize its profits.
- Monopolies can be subject to government regulation, especially when they operate in industries deemed essential or natural monopolies (e.g., utilities like water and electricity). Regulation aims to ensure fair pricing and access for consumers.
- Some monopolies arise from patents and intellectual property rights, which grant a firm exclusive control over a specific invention, technology, or innovation.
Examples of monopolies include local utilities, such as water or electricity providers in certain regions, where a single entity is the exclusive supplier and the existence of competing firms is often impractical.
Monopolies are often subject to antitrust laws and regulations in many countries to prevent anti-competitive behavior and protect consumer interests. The presence of monopoly power and market dominance can have both positive and negative economic and social consequences.
What Is Monopsony?
Monopsony is a market structure in economics characterized by the presence of a single buyer or employer that dominates a particular market or industry.
Monopsony has one major buyer of a specific product, service, or resource, and it holds significant market power to control the terms of trade.
Key features of a monopsony include:
- In a monopsony, there is a single dominant buyer that controls the entire market. This buyer is often the primary or exclusive purchaser of a particular product or service within the market.
- The monopsonist has substantial control over the purchase price and can influence the price levels offered to suppliers or employees. This allows the monopsonist to drive prices down.
- There is little or no competition in the buying side of the market. This results in suppliers or workers having limited alternatives for selling their goods or services or seeking employment.
- The demand for goods, services, or labor in a monopsony is typically inelastic. This means that suppliers or workers are less responsive to changes in the purchase price, as they have limited alternative buyers or employers.
- The monopsonist holds significant market power and can dictate the terms of trade, potentially leading to lower prices for suppliers and workers.
- Monopsonies may establish barriers to entry that make it challenging for alternative buyers or employers to enter the market, further limiting the choices available to suppliers or workers.
- Suppliers or workers in a monopsony have limited negotiating power and may have to accept the terms and conditions set by the dominant buyer or employer.
Examples of monopsonies include cases where a single company is the primary employer in a small company town, or when a dominant buyer or employer operates in an industry where alternatives for suppliers or workers are scarce.
Monopsonies can raise concerns about wage suppression and reduced competition, leading to government regulations and antitrust measures to protect the interests of suppliers, workers, and consumers.
The impact of monopsony power and market dominance can have economic and social consequences. Addressing these issues often involves a balance between market dynamics and regulatory intervention.
Main Difference between Monopoly and Monopsony
Market Role
Monopoly: Single seller dominates the market.
Monopsony: Single buyer dominates the market.
Control Over Price
Monopoly: Controls and sets the selling price.
Monopsony: Controls and sets the purchase price.
Competition
Monopoly: No competition in the selling side.
Monopsony: No competition in the buying side.
Product/Service
Monopoly: Provides a unique product or service.
Monopsony: Purchases goods, services, or labor from suppliers.
Market Power
Monopoly: Holds power over prices and supply.
Monopsony: Holds power over purchase prices and terms.
Barriers to Entry
Monopoly: High barriers to entry for competitors.
Monopsony: High barriers for alternative suppliers or employees.
Examples
Monopoly: A sole electric utility provider in a region.
Monopsony: A single large employer in a small town.
Similarities between Monopoly and Monopsony
- Both represent a situation where a single entity dominates a specific aspect of a market.
- In both cases, the dominant entity holds significant market power and can influence prices or terms of trade.
- Both market structures typically involve limited or no competition on the dominant side (selling side in monopoly, buying side in monopsony).
- Both can have implications for pricing, competition, and the interests of suppliers, workers, and consumers.
Conclusion
Monopoly and monopsony are distinct market structures, each characterized by the dominance of a single entity in a particular market.
While a monopoly represents a single seller with control over product pricing and supply, a monopsony signifies a single buyer with control over purchase prices and terms.
These differences result in varying impacts on market dynamics, pricing, competition, and the welfare of suppliers, workers, and consumers.
Understanding these distinctions is crucial for addressing the economic and social implications of both market structures and determining appropriate regulatory measures when necessary.
People Who Read This Also Read:
- Difference between Oligopoly and Monopoly
- Difference between Monopolistic and Pure Competition
- Difference between Rural and Urban Marketing
- Difference between Content and Social Media Marketing